[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141104070908.GU16186@dastard>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 18:09:08 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 019/102] xfs: don't dirty buffers beyond EOF
On Sat, Nov 01, 2014 at 10:28:03PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.64-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I'm not sure it's a good idea to pull stuff like this back into
really old stable kernels. This was part of a much larger series of
bug fixes that were fairly carefully tested. I very much doubt that
there is specific XFS test coverage on these older kernels that
would determine if this has introduced problems or not....
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
>
> commit 22e757a49cf010703fcb9c9b4ef793248c39b0c2 upstream.
>
> generic/263 is failing fsx at this point with a page spanning
> EOF that cannot be invalidated. The operations are:
>
> 1190 mapwrite 0x52c00 thru 0x5e569 (0xb96a bytes)
> 1191 mapread 0x5c000 thru 0x5d636 (0x1637 bytes)
> 1192 write 0x5b600 thru 0x771ff (0x1bc00 bytes)
I've got no idea whether generic/263 even exposes this problem
on 3.2 kernels, or whether there's a bunch of the other upstream
changes that need to be added first to expose it... :/
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists