[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3430954.VNaFmamXmP@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:01:31 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu@...euvizoso.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <mail@...elmoll.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] perf: User/kernel time correlation and event generation
On Monday 03 November 2014 17:11:53 John Stultz wrote:
> I've got some thoughts on what a possible interface that wouldn't be
> awful could look like, but I'm still hesitant because I don't really
> know if exposing this sort of data is actually a good idea long term.
I was also thinking (while working on an unrelated patch) we could use
a system call like
int clock_getoffset(clockid_t clkid, struct timespec *offs);
that returns the current offset between CLOCK_REALTIME and the
requested timebase. It is of course racy, but so is every use
of CLOCK_REALTIME. We could also use a reference other than
CLOCK_REALTIME that might be more stable, but passing two arbitrary
clocks as input would make this much more complex to implement.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists