| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54588905.7040002@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:36:29 +0530
From: Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
peterz@...radead.org, oleg@...hat.com,
hegdevasant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@...hat.com, anton@...hat.com,
systemtap@...rceware.org, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, penberg@....fi
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] perf/sdt: Add support to perf record to trace
SDT events
Hi Namhyung,
On 11/04/2014 01:08 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Hemant,
>
> As you know, you need to keep an eye on how (kprobes) event cache
> patchset from Masami settles down. For those who aren't CC'ed, please
> see the link below:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/31/207
>
> On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 16:26:28 +0530, Hemant Kumar wrote:
>> This patch adds support to perf to record SDT events. When invoked,
>> the SDT event is looked up in the sdt-cache. If its found, an entry is
>> made silently to uprobe_events file and then recording is invoked, and
>> then the entry for the SDT event in uprobe_events is silently discarded.
>>
>> The SDT events are already stored in a cache file
>> (/var/cache/perf/perf-sdt-file.cache).
>> Although the file_hash table helps in addition or deletion of SDT events
>> from the cache, its not of much use when it comes to probing the actual
>> SDT event, because the key to this hash list is a file name and not the
>> SDT event name (which is given as an argument to perf record). So, we
>> won't be able to hash into it.
> It likely to be ended up with per-file or per-buildid cache files under
> ~/.debug directory. In this case we also need to have the (central)
> event-to-cache table anyway IMHO.
>
>
>> To avoid this problem, we can create another hash list "event_hash" list
>> which will be maintained along with the file_hash list.
>> Whenever a user invokes 'perf record -e %provider:event, perf should
>> initialize the event_hash list and the file_hash list.
>> The key to event_hash list is calculated from the event name and its
>> provider name.
> Isn't it enough just to use provide name? I guess the provider names
> are (should be?) unique among a system although there's no absolute
> guarantee for that.
>
Yes, there is no guarantee for the provider names to be unique.
If we use only provider name with "perf record", then, what if a user
wants to trace
only a specific SDT event (not all the events for that provider)?
What do you think?
>> event_hash sdt_note
>> |---------| ----------------
>> | | | file_ptr |==> container file_sdt_ent
>> key = 129 =>| hlist ==|===|=> event_list=|==> to sdt notes hashed to
>> | | | name | same entry
>> |---------| | provider |
>> | | | note_list==|==> to other notes in the
>> key = 130 =>| hlist | --------------- same file
>> |---------|
>>
>> The entry at that key in event_hash contains a list of SDT notes hashed to
>> the same entry. It compares the name and provider to see if that is the SDT
>> note we are looking for. If yes, find out the file that contains this SDT
>> note. There is a file_ptr pointer embedded in this note which points to the
>> struct file_sdt_ent contained in the file_hash. From "file_sdt_ent" we will
>> find out the file name.
>> Convert this sdt note into a perf event and then write this into
>> uprobe_events file to be able to record the event.
>> Then, corresponding entries are added to uprobe_events file for
>> the SDT events.
>> After recording is done, these events are silently deleted from uprobe_events
>> file. The uprobe_events file is present in debugfs/tracing directory.
>>
>> To support the addition and deletion of SDT events to/from uprobe_events
>> file, a record_sdt struct is maintained which has the event data.
>>
>> An example usage:
>>
>> # perf record -e %libc:setjmp -aR sleep 10
>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.277 MB perf.data (~12103 samples) ]
>>
>> # perf report --stdio
>> # To display the perf.data header info, please use --header/--header-only
>> #
>> # Samples: 1 of event 'libc:setjmp'
>> # Event count (approx.): 1
>> #
>> # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
>> # ........ ....... ............. ...............
>> #
>> 100.00% sleep libc-2.16.so [.] __sigsetjmp
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hemant Kumar <hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> [SNIP]
>> +/* Session specific to SDT tracing */
>> +struct record_sdt {
>> + bool sdt; /* is this SDT event tracing? */
>> + char *str; /* hold the event name */
>> +} rec_sdt;
>> +
>> +int trace_sdt_event(const char *str)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + rec_sdt.sdt = true;
>> + rec_sdt.str = strdup(str);
>> + if (!rec_sdt.str)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + ret = event_hash_list__lookup(str);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
> Hmm.. does it support multiple SDT events recorded in a session like:
>
> # perf record -e %libc:setjmp -e %libc:longjmp -aR sleep 10
>
> ?
Yes, it supports multiple SDT events recorded in a session :
# ./perf record -e %libc:lll_lock_wait_private -e %libc:setjmp -aR sleep 10
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.264 MB perf.data (~11526 samples) ]
> [SNIP]
>> +/* Parse an SDT event */
>> +static int parse_perf_sdt_event(struct perf_sdt_event *sev,
>> + struct perf_probe_event *pev)
>> +{
>> + struct perf_probe_point *pp = &pev->point;
>> +
>> + pev->uprobes = true;
>> + pev->sdt = true;
>> + pev->event = strdup(sev->note->name);
>> + if (pev->event == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + pev->group = strdup(sev->note->provider);
>> + if (pev->event == NULL)
> s/event/group/
Will fix that.
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + pp->file = strdup(sev->file_name);
>> + if (pp->file == NULL)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + pp->function = strdup(sev->note->name);
> Missing NULL check. Also you need to free prior allocations in case of
> error.
Yes, will do that.
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>
>
>> + pp->offset = sev->note->addr.a64[0];
>> + return 0;
>> +}
--
Thanks,
Hemant Kumar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists