[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141104003827.GA24005@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 18:38:27 -0600
From: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] gpio: add GPIO hogging mechanism
Linus,
Thanks for the feedback.
To summarize the hog feature should be local to gpiolib-of.c, correct?
I also also need some clarifications, see below.
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote on Mon [2014-Nov-03 10:59:53 +0100]:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com> wrote:
>
> > qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@...0 {
> > @@ -110,6 +130,19 @@ Example of two SOC GPIO banks defined as gpio-controller nodes:
> > reg = <0x1400 0x18>;
> > gpio-controller;
> > #gpio-cells = <2>;
> > + gpio-hogs = <&line_b>;
> > +
> > + /* line_a hog is defined but not enabled in this example*/
> > + line_a: line_a {
> > + gpios = <5 0>;
> > + input;
> > + };
> > +
> > + line_b: line_b {
> > + gpios = <6 0>;
> > + output-low;
> > + line-name = "foo-bar-gpio";
> > + };
>
>
> I don't see the point of having unused hogs and enabling them using
> phandles.
>
> Just let the core walk over all children nodes of a GPIO controller
> and hog them. Put in a bool property saying it's a hog.
>
> + line_b: line_b {
> + gpio-hog;
> + gpios = <6 0>;
> + output-low;
> + line-name = "foo-bar-gpio";
> + };
>
> I don't quite see the point with input hogs that noone can use
> but whatever.
>
> I am thinking that maybe the line name should be compulsory
> so as to improbe readability. I mean there is always a reason
> why you're hogging a pin and the name should say it.
Ok, so as an alternative I had presented something like this in my reply
to Alexandre Courbot's review comments:
I did consider a "pinmux" flavored format (not sure how hard to parse it would be).
It would allow grouping if nothing else.
/* Line syntax: line_name <gpio# flags> direction-value [export] */
gpio-hogs = <&group_y>;
group_y: group_y {
gpio-hogs-group = <
line_x <15 0> output-low
line_y <16 0> output-high export
line_z <17 0> input
>;
};
Now based on your comment would something like this work?
qe_pio_a: gpio-controller@...0 {
reg = <0x1400 0x18>;
gpio-controller;
#gpio-cells = <2>;
/* Line syntax: line_name <gpio# flags> direction-value [export] */
gpio-hogs: {
gpio-hogs-group = <
foo-bar-gpio <15 0> output-low
bar-foo-gpio <16 0> output-high export
>;
};
};
This would group all hogs for one controller under a single child node.
Again I am not sure how feasible or easy to implement the DT parsing would be.
I guess for completeness if you could also comment on my reply to Alexandre from Oct 29th,
that would be great, before I head in the wrong directions.
Regards,
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists