linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <011001cff827$f14b9870$d3e2c950$@alibaba-inc.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:07:44 +0800
From:	"Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@...baba-inc.com>
To:	"'Vincent Guittot'" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	"'Wanpeng Li'" <kernellwp@...il.com>,
	"'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Preeti U Murthy'" <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"'Morten Rasmussen'" <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
	"'Kamalesh Babulal'" <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/10] sched: move cfs task on a CPU with higher capacity

> >>   +     /*
> >> +        * The dst_cpu is idle and the src_cpu CPU has only 1 CFS task.
> >
> >
> > Why specify one task instead of not less than one?
> 
> if cfs.h_nr_running = 0 (which should not occurs at that point), we
> don't need to do more test to check if it's worth moving the task
> because there is no task to move.
> 
I wonder if you can please shed light on the case that 
the dst_cpu is newly idle.

Thanks
Hillf

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/