linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] inet: Add skb_copy_datagram

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141104144258.GA14743@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Tue, 4 Nov 2014 22:42:58 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] inet: Add skb_copy_datagram_iter

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:32:00PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Too noisy, IMO.  How about skb_copy_datagram_msg() first?  The fewer
> places have to even think of iovec or iov_iter, the better...

We have places like tcp ucopy and tun that do not have msghdr.
So doing skb_copy_datagram_msg means that we'd have to create
a fake msghdr wrapper around them.  The point is not everything
comes in via sendmsg/recvmsg.

What is your motivation for hiding iov/iov_iter? Do you plan to
change their API at some future point?

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/