[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415129631.23168.3.camel@perches.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:33:51 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 net-next] esp4: remove assignment in if condition
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:28 +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
trivia:
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
[]
> @@ -392,8 +392,11 @@ static int esp_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (elen <= 0)
> goto out;
>
> - if ((err = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &trailer)) < 0)
> + err = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &trailer);
> +
> + if (err < 0)
> goto out;
Generally it's better/more common to use
foo = bar();
if (!foo)
[error_handler...]
without the blank line between the set
and the test.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists