[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20141104.150701.1883825026786055864.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 15:07:01 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: fabf@...net.be, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 net-next] esp4: remove assignment in if condition
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 11:33:51 -0800
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:28 +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>
> trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/esp4.c b/net/ipv4/esp4.c
> []
>> @@ -392,8 +392,11 @@ static int esp_input(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> if (elen <= 0)
>> goto out;
>>
>> - if ((err = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &trailer)) < 0)
>> + err = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &trailer);
>> +
>> + if (err < 0)
>> goto out;
>
> Generally it's better/more common to use
>
> foo = bar();
> if (!foo)
> [error_handler...]
>
> without the blank line between the set
> and the test.
+1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists