[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5459E343.6030907@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:43:47 +0100
From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
To: Li Liu <john.liuli@...wei.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
CC: Joel Schopp <joel.schopp@....com>,
Yingshiuan Pan <yingshiuan.pan@...il.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, remy.gauguey@....fr,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Nikolaev <n.nikolaev@...tualopensystems.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
peter.huangpeng@...wei.com,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"eric.auger@...com" <eric.auger@...com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] virtio-mmio: add irqfd support for
vhost-net based on virtio-mmio
On 10/27/2014 12:23 PM, Li Liu wrote:
>
>
> On 2014/10/27 17:37, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 25 October 2014 09:24, john.liuli <john.liuli@...wei.com> wrote:
>>> To get the interrupt reason to support such VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS
>>> features I add a new register offset VIRTIO_MMIO_ISRMEM which
>>> will help to establish a shared memory region between qemu and
>>> virtio-mmio device. Then the interrupt reason can be accessed by
>>> guest driver through this region. At the same time, the virtio-mmio
>>> dirver check this region to see irqfd is supported or not during
>>> the irq handler registration, and different handler will be assigned.
>>
>> If you want to add a new register you should probably propose
>> an update to the virtio spec. However, it seems to me it would
>> be better to get generic PCI/PCIe working on the ARM virt
>> board instead; then we can let virtio-mmio quietly fade away.
>> This has been on the todo list for ages (and there have been
>> RFC patches posted for plain PCI), it's just nobody's had time
>> to work on it.
>>
>> thanks
>> -- PMM
>>
>
> So you mean virtio-mmio will be replaced by PCI/PCIe on ARM at last?
> If so, let this patch go with the wind:). Thx.
Hi,
As a fix of current situation where ISR is only partially updated when
vhost-irqfd handles standard IRQ and waiting for PCI emuluation,
wouldn't it make sense to store ISR content on vhost driver side and
introduce ioctls to read/write it. When using vhost BE, virtio QEMU
device would use those ioctl to read/update the ISR content. On top of
that we would update the ISR in vhost before triggering the irqfd. If I
do not miss anything this would at least make things functional with irqfd.
As a second step, we could try to introduce in-kernel emulation of
ISR/ACK to fix the performance issue related to going to user-side each
time ISR/ACK accesses are done.
Do you think it is worth investigating this direction?
Thank you in advance
Best Regards
Eric
>
> Li.
>> .
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists