linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam: fix error reporting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5459ED89.2080109@freescale.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2014 11:27:37 +0200
From:	Cristian Stoica <cristian.stoica@...escale.com>
To:	Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...escale.com>
CC:	<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<horia.geanta@...escale.com>, <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam: fix error reporting

Hi Kim,

On 11/04/2014 06:57 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:57:57 +0200
> Cristian Stoica <cristian.stoica@...escale.com> wrote:

>> Do you want me to drop the patch and pretend there is nothing to see?
> 
> no, fixing potential bugs preemptively is fine; I'd just like to
> know that's the case: it wasn't clear from the original commit
> message whether the problem occurred on a new h/w revision, in which
> case I'd have like to have seen the driver updated with support for
> the new error codes.

This is a preemptive fix. I did not see a problem in the field with any
hardware, recent or old.

Cristian S.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/