[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415182994-2866-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 13:23:14 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -mm] memcg: __mem_cgroup_free: remove stale disarm_static_keys comment
cpuset code stopped using cgroup_lock in favor of cpuset_mutex long ago.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 11 -----------
1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 9a37d99aee54..95ee47c0f0a2 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -4610,17 +4610,6 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_free(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
free_percpu(memcg->stat);
- /*
- * We need to make sure that (at least for now), the jump label
- * destruction code runs outside of the cgroup lock. This is because
- * get_online_cpus(), which is called from the static_branch update,
- * can't be called inside the cgroup_lock. cpusets are the ones
- * enforcing this dependency, so if they ever change, we might as well.
- *
- * schedule_work() will guarantee this happens. Be careful if you need
- * to move this code around, and make sure it is outside
- * the cgroup_lock.
- */
disarm_static_keys(memcg);
kfree(memcg);
}
--
1.7.10.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists