[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545980A9.8030405@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:43:05 +0800
From: "Chen, Tiejun" <tiejun.chen@...el.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: x86: vmx: avoid returning bool to distinguish success
from error
On 2014/11/5 1:33, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Return a negative error code instead, and WARN() when we should be covering
> the entire 2-bit space of vmcs_field_type's return value. For increased
> robustness, add a BUILD_BUG_ON checking the range of vmcs_field_to_offset.
>
> Suggested-by: Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 12f6f9a8dd8d..0ee148f1687f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -720,12 +720,15 @@ static const unsigned short vmcs_field_to_offset_table[] = {
> FIELD(HOST_RSP, host_rsp),
> FIELD(HOST_RIP, host_rip),
> };
> -static const int max_vmcs_field = ARRAY_SIZE(vmcs_field_to_offset_table);
>
> static inline short vmcs_field_to_offset(unsigned long field)
> {
> - if (field >= max_vmcs_field || vmcs_field_to_offset_table[field] == 0)
> - return -1;
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(vmcs_field_to_offset_table) > SHRT_MAX);
> +
> + if (field >= ARRAY_SIZE(vmcs_field_to_offset_table) ||
> + vmcs_field_to_offset_table[field] == 0)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> return vmcs_field_to_offset_table[field];
> }
>
> @@ -6492,58 +6495,60 @@ static inline int vmcs_field_readonly(unsigned long field)
> * some of the bits we return here (e.g., on 32-bit guests, only 32 bits of
> * 64-bit fields are to be returned).
> */
> -static inline bool vmcs12_read_any(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - unsigned long field, u64 *ret)
> +static inline int vmcs12_read_any(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + unsigned long field, u64 *ret)
> {
> short offset = vmcs_field_to_offset(field);
> char *p;
>
> if (offset < 0)
> - return 0;
> + return offset;
>
> p = ((char *)(get_vmcs12(vcpu))) + offset;
>
> switch (vmcs_field_type(field)) {
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_NATURAL_WIDTH:
> *ret = *((natural_width *)p);
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_U16:
> *ret = *((u16 *)p);
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_U32:
> *ret = *((u32 *)p);
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_U64:
> *ret = *((u64 *)p);
> - return 1;
> + return 0;
> default:
> - return 0; /* can never happen. */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return -ENOENT;
> }
> }
>
>
> -static inline bool vmcs12_write_any(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - unsigned long field, u64 field_value){
> +static inline int vmcs12_write_any(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + unsigned long field, u64 field_value){
> short offset = vmcs_field_to_offset(field);
> char *p = ((char *) get_vmcs12(vcpu)) + offset;
> if (offset < 0)
> - return false;
> + return offset;
>
> switch (vmcs_field_type(field)) {
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_U16:
> *(u16 *)p = field_value;
> - return true;
> + return 0;
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_U32:
> *(u32 *)p = field_value;
> - return true;
> + return 0;
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_U64:
> *(u64 *)p = field_value;
> - return true;
> + return 0;
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_NATURAL_WIDTH:
> *(natural_width *)p = field_value;
> - return true;
> + return 0;
> default:
> - return false; /* can never happen. */
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> }
> @@ -6576,6 +6581,9 @@ static void copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_NATURAL_WIDTH:
> field_value = vmcs_readl(field);
> break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + continue;
'continue' versus 'break'?
Thanks
Tiejun
> }
> vmcs12_write_any(&vmx->vcpu, field, field_value);
> }
> @@ -6621,6 +6629,9 @@ static void copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> case VMCS_FIELD_TYPE_NATURAL_WIDTH:
> vmcs_writel(field, (long)field_value);
> break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + break;
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -6659,7 +6670,7 @@ static int handle_vmread(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /* Decode instruction info and find the field to read */
> field = kvm_register_readl(vcpu, (((vmx_instruction_info) >> 28) & 0xf));
> /* Read the field, zero-extended to a u64 field_value */
> - if (!vmcs12_read_any(vcpu, field, &field_value)) {
> + if (vmcs12_read_any(vcpu, field, &field_value) < 0) {
> nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_UNSUPPORTED_VMCS_COMPONENT);
> skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
> return 1;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists