lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141105152252.GV3136@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:22:52 +0200
From:	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
To:	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] [media] Deprecate v4l2_mbus_pixelcode

Hi Boris,

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 04:15:38PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:08:15 +0200
> Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi> wrote:
> > I would keep the original file name, even if the compatibility definitions
> > are there. I don't see any harm in having them around as well.
> > 
> 
> That's the part I was not sure about.
> The goal of this patch (and the following ones) is to deprecate
> v4l2_mbus_pixelcode enum and its values by adding a #warning when
> v4l2-mediabus.h file is included, thus encouraging people to use new
> definitions.
> 
> Do you see another solution to generate such warnings at compilation
> time ?

Do you think we need a warning? In a general case we can't start renaming
interface headers once the preferred interface changes, albeit in this case
it would be a possibility.

The presence of the formats defined from now on only in the new definitions
should be good enough. There are many cases such as this in the V4L2 and
other APIs.

I wonder what others think.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@....fi	XMPP: sailus@...iisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ