[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1415207589-15967-13-git-send-email-peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 12:12:55 -0500
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next v2 12/26] tty: Document check_tty_count() requires tty_lock held
Holding the tty_lock() is necessary to prevent concurrent changes
to the tty count that may cause it to differ from the open file
list count. The tty_lock() is already held at all call sites.
NB: Note that the check for the pty master tty count is safe because
the slave's tty_lock() is held while decrementing the pty master
tty count.
Reviewed-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
---
drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index 276d939..41eeee0 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ int tty_paranoia_check(struct tty_struct *tty, struct inode *inode,
return 0;
}
+/* Caller must hold tty_lock */
static int check_tty_count(struct tty_struct *tty, const char *routine)
{
#ifdef CHECK_TTY_COUNT
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists