lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1417202.djDaFURS6d@avalon>
Date:	Wed, 05 Nov 2014 20:17:38 +0200
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Infer map type from DT property

Hi Sören,

On Wednesday 05 November 2014 10:09:35 Sören Brinkmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 03:56PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday 03 November 2014 11:05:26 Soren Brinkmann wrote:
> > > With the new 'groups' property, the DT parser can infer the map type
> > > from the fact whether 'pins' or 'groups' is used to specify the pin
> > > group to work on.
> > > To maintain backwards compatibitliy with current usage of the DT
> > > binding, this is only done when an invalid map type is passed to the
> > > parsing function.
> > 
> > The Renesas PFC implements similar bindings with using the vendor-specific
> > properties "renesas,pins" and "renesas,groups" (bindings and
> > implementation available at
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,pfc-pinctrl.txt and
> > drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c respectively).
> > 
> > The Renesas implementation is a bit more generic in that it allows both
> > pins and groups to be specified in a single subnode. Do you think that
> > feature would make sense for pinconf-generic as well ?
> 
> I don't have a use-case for that. I guess if somebody needs this kind of
> functionality it could be added later. I would like to avoid blocking
> pinctrl-zynq on adding more features here.

I'm fine with that, as long as the changes won't require breaking the DT ABI. 
I don't think they would but I wanted to raise the issue in case I would have 
missed a potential issue.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ