[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1tvbmtwbqq.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 22:58:37 +0100
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, f.fainelli@...il.com,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: cma: Align to physical address, not CMA region position
On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Gregory Fong wrote:
> The alignment in cma_alloc() was done w.r.t. the bitmap. This is a
> problem when, for example:
>
> - a device requires 16M (order 12) alignment
> - the CMA region is not 16 M aligned
>
> In such a case, can result with the CMA region starting at, say,
> 0x2f800000 but any allocation you make from there will be aligned from
> there. Requesting an allocation of 32 M with 16 M alignment will
> result in an allocation from 0x2f800000 to 0x31800000, which doesn't
> work very well if your strange device requires 16M alignment.
>
> Change to use bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() to account for the
> difference in alignment at reserve-time and alloc-time.
>
> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
> ---
> mm/cma.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index fde706e..0813599 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,17 @@ static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(struct cma *cma, int align_order)
> return (1UL << (align_order - cma->order_per_bit)) - 1;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long cma_bitmap_aligned_offset(struct cma *cma, int align_order)
> +{
> + unsigned int alignment;
> +
> + if (align_order <= cma->order_per_bit)
> + return 0;
> + alignment = 1UL << (align_order - cma->order_per_bit);
> + return ALIGN(cma->base_pfn, alignment) -
> + (cma->base_pfn >> cma->order_per_bit);
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long cma_bitmap_maxno(struct cma *cma)
> {
> return cma->count >> cma->order_per_bit;
> @@ -328,7 +339,7 @@ err:
> */
> struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, int count, unsigned int align)
> {
> - unsigned long mask, pfn, start = 0;
> + unsigned long mask, offset, pfn, start = 0;
> unsigned long bitmap_maxno, bitmap_no, bitmap_count;
> struct page *page = NULL;
> int ret;
> @@ -343,13 +354,15 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, int count, unsigned int align)
> return NULL;
>
> mask = cma_bitmap_aligned_mask(cma, align);
> + offset = cma_bitmap_aligned_offset(cma, align);
> bitmap_maxno = cma_bitmap_maxno(cma);
> bitmap_count = cma_bitmap_pages_to_bits(cma, count);
>
> for (;;) {
> mutex_lock(&cma->lock);
> - bitmap_no = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(cma->bitmap,
> - bitmap_maxno, start, bitmap_count, mask);
> + bitmap_no = bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off(cma->bitmap,
> + bitmap_maxno, start, bitmap_count, mask,
> + offset);
> if (bitmap_no >= bitmap_maxno) {
> mutex_unlock(&cma->lock);
> break;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists