[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xa1tsihxwblf.fsf@mina86.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 23:01:48 +0100
From: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@...il.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Subject: Re: CMA alignment question
> On Tue, Nov 04 2014, Gregory Fong wrote:
>> The alignment in cma_alloc() is done w.r.t. the bitmap. This is a
>> problem when, for example:
>>
>> - a device requires 16M (order 12) alignment
>> - the CMA region is not 16 M aligned
On Wed, Nov 05 2014, Weijie Yang wrote:
> I think the device driver should ensure that situation could not occur,
> by assign suitable alignment parameter in cma_declare_contiguous().
What about default CMA area? Besides, I think principle of least
surprise applies here and alignment should be physical.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<mpn@...gle.com>--<xmpp:mina86@...ber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists