[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141105035224.GB9419@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 19:52:24 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Weng Meiling <wengmeiling.weng@...wei.com>,
Frans Klaver <fransklaver@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xiang Rui <rui.xiang@...wei.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Huang Qiang <h.huangqiang@...wei.com>,
Zhao Hongjiang <zhaohongjiang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] kobject: fix the race between kobject_del and
get_device_parent
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:29:43PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:27:39AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > Keep the parent directory looks good to me, we could only add kobject_get(&parent)
> > after the parent dir be created.
> >
> > ....
> > /* or create a new class-directory at the parent device */
> > k = class_dir_create_and_add(dev->class, parent_kobj);
> > /* do not emit an uevent for this simple "glue" directory */
> > kobject_get(k); <--------add parent ref count for first child device.
>
> The created directory would already have the base ref. I don't think
> you need the above. Just never put the parent once created.
>
> Greg, how does this sound to you?
It makes sense, but I don't understand, what "parent" directory is going
away and causing problems?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists