lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1415313426-9622-153-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  6 Nov 2014 14:36:56 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 152/162] ext4: fix overflow when updating superblock backups after resize

3.13.11.11 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

commit 9378c6768e4fca48971e7b6a9075bc006eda981d upstream.

When there are no meta block groups update_backups() will compute the
backup block in 32-bit arithmetics thus possibly overflowing the block
number and corrupting the filesystem. OTOH filesystems without meta
block groups larger than 16 TB should be rare. Fix the problem by doing
the counting in 64-bit arithmetics.

Coverity-id: 741252
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 fs/ext4/resize.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index 14e0f8a..2400ad1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -1071,7 +1071,7 @@ static void update_backups(struct super_block *sb, int blk_off, char *data,
 			break;
 
 		if (meta_bg == 0)
-			backup_block = group * bpg + blk_off;
+			backup_block = ((ext4_fsblk_t)group) * bpg + blk_off;
 		else
 			backup_block = (ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) +
 					ext4_bg_has_super(sb, group));
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ