linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] include/linux/audit.h: Move dummy audit_file() from !AUDIT area to !AUDITSYSCALL area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <p3in3107wrybjk5en98pym0r.1415316933281@email.android.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Nov 2014 07:39:49 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
To:	Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, eparis@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] include/linux/audit.h: Move dummy audit_file() from
 !AUDIT area to !AUDITSYSCALL area

I intended to put it here for topology symmetric position with the
real world declaration.  Please check.

Thanks.

Send from Lenovo A788t.

Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:

>On Thursday, November 06, 2014 11:19:06 AM Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 11/6/14 4:43, Paul Moore wrote:
>> > On Tuesday, November 04, 2014 11:09:52 PM Chen Gang wrote:
>> >> audit_file() is related with AUDITSYSCALL, not related with AUDIT, so
>> >> need move dummy one from !AUDIT area to !AUDITSYSCALL area. Or it will
>> >> cause issue if CONFIG_AUDIT with !CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL.
>> >> 
>> >> The related error (with allmodconfig under tile):
>> >>     CC      fs/open.o
>> >>   
>> >>   fs/open.c: In function 'SYSC_fchmod':
>> >>   fs/open.c:530:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'audit_file'
>> >> 
>> >> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] audit_file(f.file);
>> >> 
>> >>      ^
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> 
>> >>  include/linux/audit.h | 5 ++---
>> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> > 
>> > What version of the kernel source are you looking at?  I don't see the
>> > audit_file() function anywhere ...
>> 
>> It is for next tree. Sorry for not marking it in subject, originally.
>
>Sorry, I didn't see Al's patch posted to the audit list and it wasn't in the 
>audit next branch so I was a bit confused.
>
>Regardless, it looks fine to me.  While normally I'd pull this into the audit 
>next branch, in this case it is best if Al pulls this into his tree so it goes 
>in with the original audit_file() patch.
>
>If you have to respin this patch I might suggest moving the prototype to after 
>the other audit_inode*() prototypes, e.g. just before audit_core_dumps(), but 
>that is a pretty nit-picky thing.
>
>Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
>
>> >> diff --git a/include/linux/audit.h b/include/linux/audit.h
>> >> index 295ae1c..7b1d0d1 100644
>> >> --- a/include/linux/audit.h
>> >> +++ b/include/linux/audit.h
>> >> @@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ static inline void audit_inode(struct filename *name,
>> >> 
>> >>  				const struct dentry *dentry,
>> >>  				unsigned int parent)
>> >>  
>> >>  { }
>> >> 
>> >> +static inline void audit_file(struct file *file)
>> >> +{ }
>> >> 
>> >>  static inline void audit_inode_parent_hidden(struct filename *name,
>> >>  
>> >>  				const struct dentry *dentry)
>> >>  
>> >>  { }
>> >> 
>> >> @@ -538,9 +540,6 @@ static inline void audit_log_task_info(struct
>> >> audit_buffer *ab, struct task_struct *tsk)
>> >> 
>> >>  { }
>> >>  #define audit_enabled 0
>> >> 
>> >> -static inline void audit_file(struct file *file)
>> >> -{
>> >> -}
>> >> 
>> >>  #endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT */
>> >>  static inline void audit_log_string(struct audit_buffer *ab, const char
>> >> 
>> >> *buf) {
>
>-- 
>paul moore
>www.paul-moore.com
>