linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: enable pxa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:01:29 +0400
From:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: enable pxa_timer for SA-1100 platform

Hello,

2014-10-20 23:07 GMT+04:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Wednesday 15 October 2014 16:50:04 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> SA-11x0 platform used the same IP block as was used on PXA. Consequently
>> it makes sense to have only one driver. Enable pxa_timer clocksource for
>> StrongARM platform.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
>
> Both patches look good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Should we merge them through arm-soc or through the clocksource tree?


Thomas added his blessing (and an ack) to merge these patches through arm-soc.
Should I gather any additional Acks before it cn hit arm-soc/for-next?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/