linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for more chips versions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1415260480.13103.3.camel@mm-sol.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:54:40 +0200
From:	"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@...sol.com>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: qcom-spmi-pmic: Add support for more chips versions


On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 17:36 -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@...sol.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 10:11 -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@...sol.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > [..]
> > > > @@ -28,11 +144,27 @@ static int pmic_spmi_probe(struct spmi_device
> > > > *sdev)
> > > >  {
> > > >         struct device_node *root = sdev->dev.of_node;
> > > >         struct regmap *regmap;
> > > > +       struct property *prop;
> > > > +       int major, minor, ret;
> > > > +       char *name, compatible[32];
> > > > 
> > > >         regmap = devm_regmap_init_spmi_ext(sdev,
> > > > &spmi_regmap_config);
> > > >         if (IS_ERR(regmap))
> > > >                 return PTR_ERR(regmap);
> > > > 
> > > > +       ret = pmic_spmi_read_revid(regmap, &name, &major, &minor);
> > > > +       if (!ret) {
> > > > +               snprintf(compatible, ARRAY_SIZE(compatible),
> > > > "qcom,%s-v%d.%d",
> > > > +                        name, major, minor);
> > > > +               prop = kzalloc(sizeof(*prop), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +               if (prop) {
> > > > +                       prop->name = kstrdup("compatible",
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +                       prop->value = kstrdup(compatible,
> > > > GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > +                       prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
> > > > +                       of_update_property(root, prop);
> > > > +               }
> > > > +       }
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > Why would you do this?
> > > What benefit does it give to patch the of_node to have a more
> > > specific
> > > compatible?
> > 
> > Some of the child device drivers have to know PMIC chip revision.
> > 
> 
> So your plan is to have a strstr(parent->compatible, "-v2") there?

Actually also PMIC subtype (pm8841, pm8226...) is also required, so 
the plan is to have something like this:

{
        static const struct of_device_id pmic_match_table[] = {
                { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-v1.0" },
                { .compatible = "qcom,pm8841-v0.0" },
                { }

        };

        const struct of_device_id *match;

        match = of_match_device(pmic_match_table, pdev->dev.parent);
        if (match) {
                dev_info(&pdev->dev, "%s chip detected\n", match->compatible);
        }
}

> 
> Could you be a little bit more elaborate on what you're trying to do
> and which child devices that might be?

For example ADC drivers are required temperature compensation based
on PMIC variant and chip manufacturer.

This patch have one issue, at least :-). Using of_update_property will prevent
driver to be build as module. which, I think, is coming from the fact the
on first load it will modify device compatible property and will be impossible
driver to match device id again. Still thinking how to overcome this.

Regards,
Ivan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/