linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/35] UBI: Fastmap: Add self check to detect absent PEBs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:55:42 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tlinder@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/35] UBI: Fastmap: Add self check to detect absent PEBs

On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 17:05 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 05.11.2014 um 17:01 schrieb Artem Bityutskiy:
> > On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 16:56 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>  I did that to have alloc and free balanced.
> >> I.e. to not have a naked kfree(). Always when I see a kfree()
> >> somewhere
> >> I'd like to see the k*alloc().
> > 
> > OK. Please, just make the comment simpler then. Say that you are freeing
> > the debugging buffer or something.
> 
> Will do!

I suggest you to prepare a short series of patches and send this out. I
think I can process them faster then. When you send 35 patches I tend to
postpone the review because it looks like a a lot of work which needs a
lot of time. Small series is easier to deal with.

So instead of re-sending 35 patches, just send 3 or for good patches,
I'll pick them much faster, I think.

Artem.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/