[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFoiAPJu-wp1c1N05tWggOE+2agUMDEV03TnpEjY1S6Jzg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 11:00:00 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] PM / Runtime: Allow accessing irq_safe if no PM_RUNTIME
On 6 November 2014 09:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> Some drivers (e.g. bus drivers) may want to check if power.irq_safe was
> called by child driver, regardless of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.
>
> An example scenario is amba/bus.c and dma/pl330.c drivers. The runtime
> suspend/resume callbacks in amba bus driver act differently if irq_safe
> was set by child driver (in irq_safe mode bus clock is only disabled).
>
> The pl330 driver sets irq_safe and assumes that amba bus driver will
> only disable the clock in runtime PM. So in system sleep suspend
> callback the pl330 driver unprepares the clock after calling
> pm_runtime_force_suspend().
>
> However inconsistency would appear if CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is not set and
> child drivers do not want the irq_safe runtime PM. In such case amba bus
> driver still has to know whether child driver wanted irq_safe - by
> looking at dev->power.irq_safe field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
FWIW: Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> include/linux/pm.h | 2 +-
> include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm.h b/include/linux/pm.h
> index 383fd68aaee1..b05fa954f50d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm.h
> @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
> bool ignore_children:1;
> bool early_init:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
> bool direct_complete:1; /* Owned by the PM core */
> + unsigned int irq_safe:1; /* PM runtime */
> spinlock_t lock;
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> struct list_head entry;
> @@ -590,7 +591,6 @@ struct dev_pm_info {
> unsigned int run_wake:1;
> unsigned int runtime_auto:1;
> unsigned int no_callbacks:1;
> - unsigned int irq_safe:1;
> unsigned int use_autosuspend:1;
> unsigned int timer_autosuspends:1;
> unsigned int memalloc_noio:1;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> index 367f49b9a1c9..d94a65662a60 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
> @@ -166,7 +166,10 @@ static inline bool pm_runtime_suspended_if_enabled(struct device *dev) { return
> static inline bool pm_runtime_enabled(struct device *dev) { return false; }
>
> static inline void pm_runtime_no_callbacks(struct device *dev) {}
> -static inline void pm_runtime_irq_safe(struct device *dev) {}
> +static inline void pm_runtime_irq_safe(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + dev->power.irq_safe = 1;
> +}
>
> static inline bool pm_runtime_callbacks_present(struct device *dev) { return false; }
> static inline void pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(struct device *dev) {}
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists