[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141106125405.GI8354@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:54:05 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Myron Stowe <mstowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Only remove domain when device is removed
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 09:12:17AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I haven't tested it, but I'm concerned whether this has introduced a
> domain leak. If we think about the case of unbinding a device from a
> host driver and attaching it to a domain through the IOMMU API, I think
> we used to count on this path to call domain_exit(), which made the
> domain_context_mapped() in intel_iommu_attach_device() "unlikely". With
> this change, isn't the test in intel_iommu_attach_device() now neither
> likely nor unlikely and we're only removing the dev_info from the domain
> and not destroying the domain itself? Thanks,
As I see it, there is no leak. The DMA-API domains are kept in the
device_domain_list and re-used when the device driver re-attaches. But
your are right that the unlikely in intel_iommu_attach_device() isn't
true anymore. We could probably remove it.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists