[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141106021934.GB17253@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:19:34 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the usb.current
tree
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 20:30 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 03:18:25PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/usb/host/Kconfig between commit cd6e245a2d06 ("usb: Remove
> > > references to non-existent PLAT_S5P symbol") from the usb.current tree
> > > and commit dd3cf17488b1 ("usb: host: Remove optional dependencies on
> > > PLAT_S5P") from the usb tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I used the usb tree version) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary (no action is required).
> >
> > That's the correct fix, thanks for doing that.
>
> Shouldn't that be the other way round?
Sorry, you are right, I read the merge backwards.
> I thought we would choose Sylwester's commit from the usb.current tree
> over my commit from the usb tree. Or will Sylwester's commit end up in
> linux-next through yet another usb tree?
I will do that when I do the merge in my tree when it hits Linus's tree.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists