linux-kernel - [PATCH V8 08/14] perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1415285671-16894-9-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date:	Thu,  6 Nov 2014 09:54:25 -0500
From:	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
To:	a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, eranian@...gle.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, paulus@...ba.org,
	acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V8 08/14] perf, x86: track number of events that use LBR callstack

From: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>

When enabling/disabling an event, check if the event uses the LBR
callstack feature, adjust the LBR callstack usage count accordingly.
Later patch will use the usage count to decide if LBR stack should
be saved/restored.

Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index 4246053..eb584ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -205,9 +205,15 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_sched_task(struct perf_event_context *ctx, bool sched_in)
 	}
 }
 
+static inline bool branch_user_callstack(unsigned br_sel)
+{
+	return (br_sel & X86_BR_USER) && (br_sel & X86_BR_CALL_STACK);
+}
+
 void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
@@ -222,6 +228,12 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 	}
 	cpuc->br_sel = event->hw.branch_reg.reg;
 
+	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx &&
+					event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
+		task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
+		task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users++;
+	}
+
 	cpuc->lbr_users++;
 	perf_sched_cb_inc(event->ctx->pmu);
 }
@@ -229,10 +241,17 @@ void intel_pmu_lbr_enable(struct perf_event *event)
 void intel_pmu_lbr_disable(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
+	struct x86_perf_task_context *task_ctx;
 
 	if (!x86_pmu.lbr_nr)
 		return;
 
+	if (branch_user_callstack(cpuc->br_sel) && event->ctx &&
+					event->ctx->task_ctx_data) {
+		task_ctx = event->ctx->task_ctx_data;
+		task_ctx->lbr_callstack_users--;
+	}
+
 	cpuc->lbr_users--;
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(cpuc->lbr_users < 0);
 	perf_sched_cb_dec(event->ctx->pmu);
-- 
1.8.3.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/