[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141106151314.GG2001@dhcp128.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:13:14 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 07/12 v3] tracing: Have seq_buf use full buffer
On Wed 2014-11-05 15:21:30, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2014 17:31:50 +0100
> Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:
>
>
> > > /**
> > > * seq_buf_print_seq - move the contents of seq_buf into a seq_file
> > > @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ int seq_buf_vprintf(struct seq_buf *s, const char *fmt, va_list args)
> > >
> > > if (s->len < s->size) {
> > > len = vsnprintf(s->buffer + s->len, s->size - s->len, fmt, args);
> > > - if (s->len + len < s->size) {
> > > + if (s->len + len <= s->size) {
> >
> > This is always true because we limit vsnprintf() to write (s->size -
> > s->len) bytes. Similar problem is also in the other parts of this
> > patch.
>
> No, len is the length of bytes that should have been written, not the
> amount that has been written.
That is cool! I did not know that there was also this variant of the
printf() functions. I am still learning.
Best Regards,
Petr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists