lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <545BC091.9000503@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Nov 2014 10:40:17 -0800
From:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jslaby@...e.cz,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, jingchang.lu@...escale.com,
	gregory.0xf0@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: of-serial: zero-out struct of_serial_info

On 11/06/2014 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 10:23:49AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 10/30/2014 02:55 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Thursday 30 October 2014 14:18:33 Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>> of_platform_serial_probe() invokes of_platform_serial_setup() with a
>>>> kmalloc'd struct of_serial_info cookie, which is not much of a problem
>>>> for most of the struct of_serial_info fields we access but info->clk.
>>>>
>>>> On platforms which do not provide a clock phandle for their UART nodes
>>>> but do provide a 'clock-frequency' property, we basically leave the
>>>> info->clk variable uninitialized, and this craps out during
>>>> suspend/resume with oopses, crashes or warnings in the clock code.
>>>>
>>>> Fix this by using kzalloc() which also zeroes-out the structure and
>>>> provides an initialized info->clk member set to NULL.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 2dea53bf57783 ("serial: of-serial: add PM suspend/resume support")
>>>> Fixes: e34b9c94b6e8d ("[POWERPC] of_serial: add port type checking")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I thought I'd acked this patch before, maybe someone else sent the same
>>> one. This is definitely required, so
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks, so who's taking that patch? Let me know if I need to resubmit
>> targeting a specific tree.
> 
> Someone else sent this before you did, and I took that version instead,
> sorry.

Not a problem, my message contained much more explanations, but the end
result is the same.

Thanks!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ