linux-kernel - Re: [V10 PATCH 2/2] irqchip: gicv2m: Add supports for ARM GICv2m MSI(-X)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <545ABF6C.1000308@amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2014 18:23:08 -0600
From:	Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	<mark.rutland@....com>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	<Catalin.Marinas@....com>, <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	<liviu.dudau@....com>, <Harish.Kasiviswanathan@....com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [V10 PATCH 2/2] irqchip: gicv2m: Add supports for ARM GICv2m
 MSI(-X)

On 11/5/2014 6:05 PM, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> - Overall, it seems that msi_domain_alloc() could be quite different
> across architectures. Would it be possible to declare this function as
> weak, and allow arch to override (similar to arch_setup_msi_irq)?

Actually, declaring "msi_domain_ops" as non-static, and allow other code 
to override the .alloc and .free?

Thanks,

Suravee



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/