linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8] kernel, add panic_on

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20141106220731.GA13590@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:07:31 -0500
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Fabian Frederick <fabf@...net.be>,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, jbaron@...mai.com,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] kernel, add panic_on_warn

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:57:36PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:

[..]
> You see that doing
> 
> 	if (panic_on_warn) {
> 		panic_on_warn = 0;
> 		panic(...);
> 	}
> 
> is racy, I hope.  If two threads WARN() at the same time, then there's 
> nothing preventing a double panic() because WARN() itself is not 
> serialized against anything.  So both the current comment and your 
> suggested revision comment are bogus.

panic() is serialized on panic_lock. So I guess it is fine to hit WARN()
on multiple cpus. Do you see an issue there?

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/