linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13 099/162] KVM: x86: Fix wrong masking on relative jump/call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1415313426-9622-100-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  6 Nov 2014 14:36:03 -0800
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13 099/162] KVM: x86: Fix wrong masking on relative jump/call

3.13.11.11 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>

commit 05c83ec9b73c8124555b706f6af777b10adf0862 upstream.

Relative jumps and calls do the masking according to the operand size, and not
according to the address size as the KVM emulator does today.

This patch fixes KVM behavior.

Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...technion.ac.il>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 7bff3e2..44fc76b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -498,11 +498,6 @@ static void rsp_increment(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int inc)
 	masked_increment(reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RSP), stack_mask(ctxt), inc);
 }
 
-static inline void jmp_rel(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int rel)
-{
-	register_address_increment(ctxt, &ctxt->_eip, rel);
-}
-
 static u32 desc_limit_scaled(struct desc_struct *desc)
 {
 	u32 limit = get_desc_limit(desc);
@@ -576,6 +571,28 @@ static int emulate_nm(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 	return emulate_exception(ctxt, NM_VECTOR, 0, false);
 }
 
+static inline void assign_eip_near(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, ulong dst)
+{
+	switch (ctxt->op_bytes) {
+	case 2:
+		ctxt->_eip = (u16)dst;
+		break;
+	case 4:
+		ctxt->_eip = (u32)dst;
+		break;
+	case 8:
+		ctxt->_eip = dst;
+		break;
+	default:
+		WARN(1, "unsupported eip assignment size\n");
+	}
+}
+
+static inline void jmp_rel(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, int rel)
+{
+	assign_eip_near(ctxt, ctxt->_eip + rel);
+}
+
 static u16 get_segment_selector(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned seg)
 {
 	u16 selector;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/