| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20141107084604.GD24745@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:46:04 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: LKP <lkp@...org>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [dmi] PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:ffffffff81899e6b
error 9 cr2 ffffffffff240000
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 09:23:56AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 7 November 2014 09:13, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:44:40AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> On 7 November 2014 08:37, Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> >> On 7 November 2014 06:47, LKP <lkp@...org> wrote:
> >> >> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >> >> >
> >> >> > https://git.linaro.org/people/ard.biesheuvel/linux-arm efi-for-3.19
> >> >> > commit aacdce6e880894acb57d71dcb2e3fc61b4ed4e96 ("dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 64-bit entry point")
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +-----------------------+------------+------------+
> >> >> > | | 2fa165a26c | aacdce6e88 |
> >> >> > +-----------------------+------------+------------+
> >> >> > | boot_successes | 20 | 10 |
> >> >> > | early-boot-hang | 1 | |
> >> >> > | boot_failures | 0 | 5 |
> >> >> > | PANIC:early_exception | 0 | 5 |
> >> >> > +-----------------------+------------+------------+
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000000100000000-0x000000036fffffff] usable
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] bootconsole [earlyser0] enabled
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] NX (Execute Disable) protection: active
> >> >> > PANIC: early exception 0e rip 10:ffffffff81899e6b error 9 cr2 ffffffffff240000
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.18.0-rc2-gc5221e6 #1
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 ffffffff82203d30 ffffffff819f0a6e 00000000000003f8
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] ffffffffff240000 ffffffff82203e18 ffffffff823701b0 ffffffff82511401
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] 0000000000000000 0000000000000ba3 0000000000000000 ffffffffff240000
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] Call Trace:
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff819f0a6e>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823701b0>] early_idt_handler+0x90/0xb7
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823c80da>] ? dmi_save_one_device+0x81/0x81
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81899e6b>] ? dmi_table+0x3f/0x94
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff81899e42>] ? dmi_table+0x16/0x94
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823c80da>] ? dmi_save_one_device+0x81/0x81
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823c80da>] ? dmi_save_one_device+0x81/0x81
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823c7eff>] dmi_walk_early+0x44/0x69
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823c88a2>] dmi_present+0x180/0x1ff
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823c8ab3>] dmi_scan_machine+0x144/0x191
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff82370702>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff82377f52>] setup_arch+0x490/0xc73
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff819eef73>] ? printk+0x4d/0x4f
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff82370b90>] start_kernel+0x9c/0x43f
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff82370120>] ? early_idt_handlers+0x120/0x120
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823704a2>] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] [<ffffffff823705df>] x86_64_start_kernel+0x13b/0x14a
> >> >> > [ 0.000000] RIP 0x4
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> This is most puzzling. Could anyone decode the exception?
> >> >> This looks like the non-EFI path through dmi_scan_machine(), which
> >> >> calls dmi_present() /after/ calling dmi_smbios3_present(), which
> >> >> apparently has not found the _SM3_ header tag. Or could the call stack
> >> >> be inaccurate?
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyway, it would be good to know the exact type of the platform,
> >> >
> >> > It's a Nehalem-EP machine, wht 16 CPU and 12G memory.
> >> >
> >> >> and
> >> >> perhaps we could find out if there is an inadvertent _SM3_ tag
> >> >> somewhere in the 0xF0000 - 0xFFFFF range?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, how?
> >> >
> >>
> >> That's not a brand new machine, so I suppose there wouldn't be a
> >> SMBIOS 3.0 header lurking in there.
> >>
> >> Anyway, if you are in a position to try things, could you apply this
> >>
> >> --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> >> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
> >> memset(buf, 0, 16);
> >> for (q = p; q < p + 0x10000; q += 16) {
> >> memcpy_fromio(buf + 16, q, 16);
> >> - if (!dmi_smbios3_present(buf) || !dmi_present(buf)) {
> >> + if (!dmi_present(buf)) {
> >> dmi_available = 1;
> >> dmi_early_unmap(p, 0x10000);
> >> goto out;
> >>
> >> and try again?
> >
> > kernel boots perfectly with this patch applied.
> >
> > --yliu
> >
>
> Thank you! Very useful to know
>
Sigh, I made a silly error, I speicified wrong commit while testing your
patch. Sorry for that.
And I tested it again, with your former patch, sorry, the panic still
happens.
--yliu
> Sorry to keep you busy, but could you please apply this on top of the
> previous patch
>
> --- a/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c
> @@ -617,6 +617,8 @@ void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
> memset(buf, 0, 16);
> for (q = p; q < p + 0x10000; q += 16) {
> memcpy_fromio(buf + 16, q, 16);
> + if (memcmp(buf, "_SM3_", 5) == 0)
> + pr_warn("DMI: Ignoring SMBIOS 3.0
> header at %p\n", buf);
> if (!dmi_present(buf)) {
> dmi_available = 1;
> dmi_early_unmap(p, 0x10000);
>
>
> and check if there is any output?
>
> Thanks again,
> Ard.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists