linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: add sdhci quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:30:45 -0800
From:	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
	"Piotr Krol" <pietrushnic@...il.com>
CC:	<linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 5/5] mmc: sdhci-bcm2835: add sdhci quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12

On 14-11-05 08:50 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/05/2014 12:02 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
>> On 14-11-04 09:00 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 10/30/2014 12:36 AM, Scott Branden wrote:
>>>> SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12 is missing and needed for this
>>>> controller.
>>>
>>> This seems fine, although any explanation of why this quirk is needed
>>> would be useful.
>>>
>> I don't know who to talk to at Arasan about this.  Will try hunting
>> around a little for more info as to why this is needed to have eMMC and
>> SD work properly through our internal testing on other non-2835 chipset
>> that shares the same SDHCI controller as 2835.
>
> I thought I heard that this wasn't a bug in the controller itself, but
> rather an integration issue between the IP core and the register bus
> it's attached to. Consequently, it may be SoC-specific or at least have
> SoC-specific variations?
Yes, this patch is to fix a different bug (in the IP) rather than the 
clock domain integration issue.
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/