[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141107185844.GR4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:58:44 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Propagate prepare and enable when reparenting
orphans
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 10:51:52AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 4896ae9..a3d3d58 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -1650,6 +1650,17 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent)
> clk_reparent(clk, new_parent);
> __clk_recalc_accuracies(clk);
> __clk_recalc_rates(clk, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
> +
> + if (clk->prepare_count) {
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + __clk_prepare(new_parent);
> +
> + flags = clk_enable_lock();
> + if (clk->enable_count)
> + __clk_enable(new_parent);
> + clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> + }
I really don't understand why this isn't already done - I said this was
necessary a /long/ time ago.
However, the above isn't sufficient. Think about the old parent - this
should be disabled and unprepared if it was prepared and enabled by the
child.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists