[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1411072255130.4252@axis700.grange>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 23:06:21 +0100 (CET)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] of: Decrement refcount of previous endpoint in
of_graph_get_next_endpoint
Hi Philipp,
Thanks for the patch and sorry for a late reply. I did look at your
patches earlier too, but maybe not attentively enough, or maybe I'm
misunderstanding something now. In the scan_of_host() function in
soc_camera.c as of current -next I see:
epn = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(np, epn);
which already looks like a refcount leak to me. If epn != NULL, its
refcount is incremented, but then immediately the variable gets
overwritten, and there's no extra copy of that variable to fix this. If
I'm right, then that bug in itself should be fixed, ideally before your
patch is applied. But in fact, your patch fixes this, since it modifies
of_graph_get_next_endpoint() to return with prev's refcount not
incremented, right? Whereas the of_node_put(epn) later down in
scan_of_host() decrements refcount of the _next_ endpoint, not the
previous one, so, it should be left alone? I.e. AFAICT your modification
to of_graph_get_next_endpoint() fixes soc_camera.c with no further
modifications to it required?
Thanks
Guennadi
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> Decrementing the reference count of the previous endpoint node allows to
> use the of_graph_get_next_endpoint function in a for_each_... style macro.
> All current users of this function that pass a non-NULL prev parameter
> (that is, soc_camera and imx-drm) are changed to not decrement the passed
> prev argument's refcount themselves.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> Changes since v4:
> - Folded patches 1-3 into this one
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/of/base.c | 9 +--------
> drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c | 12 ++----------
> 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> index f4308fe..619b2d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/soc_camera.c
> @@ -1696,7 +1696,6 @@ static void scan_of_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
> if (!i)
> soc_of_bind(ici, epn, ren->parent);
>
> - of_node_put(epn);
> of_node_put(ren);
>
> if (i) {
> @@ -1704,6 +1703,8 @@ static void scan_of_host(struct soc_camera_host *ici)
> break;
> }
> }
> +
> + of_node_put(epn);
> }
>
> #else
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 293ed4b..f7a9aa8 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -2070,8 +2070,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_graph_parse_endpoint);
> * @prev: previous endpoint node, or NULL to get first
> *
> * Return: An 'endpoint' node pointer with refcount incremented. Refcount
> - * of the passed @prev node is not decremented, the caller have to use
> - * of_node_put() on it when done.
> + * of the passed @prev node is decremented.
> */
> struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> struct device_node *prev)
> @@ -2107,12 +2106,6 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct device_node *parent,
> if (WARN_ONCE(!port, "%s(): endpoint %s has no parent node\n",
> __func__, prev->full_name))
> return NULL;
> -
> - /*
> - * Avoid dropping prev node refcount to 0 when getting the next
> - * child below.
> - */
> - of_node_get(prev);
> }
>
> while (1) {
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c
> index 6b22106..12303b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/imx-drm/imx-drm-core.c
> @@ -434,14 +434,6 @@ static uint32_t imx_drm_find_crtc_mask(struct imx_drm_device *imxdrm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct device_node *imx_drm_of_get_next_endpoint(
> - const struct device_node *parent, struct device_node *prev)
> -{
> - struct device_node *node = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(parent, prev);
> - of_node_put(prev);
> - return node;
> -}
> -
> int imx_drm_encoder_parse_of(struct drm_device *drm,
> struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct device_node *np)
> {
> @@ -453,7 +445,7 @@ int imx_drm_encoder_parse_of(struct drm_device *drm,
> for (i = 0; ; i++) {
> u32 mask;
>
> - ep = imx_drm_of_get_next_endpoint(np, ep);
> + ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(np, ep);
> if (!ep)
> break;
>
> @@ -502,7 +494,7 @@ int imx_drm_encoder_get_mux_id(struct device_node *node,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> do {
> - ep = imx_drm_of_get_next_endpoint(node, ep);
> + ep = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(node, ep);
> if (!ep)
> break;
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists