linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the sound-asoc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 15:51:42 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the
 sound-asoc tree

Hi Greg,

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:38:53 +0900 Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 03:31:32PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> > sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c between commit 2e4f75919e5a ("ASoC:
> > Intel: Add PM support to HSW/BDW PCM driver") from the sound-asoc tree
> > and commit 3c1af8802e45 ("ASoC: intel: drop owner assignment from
> > platform_drivers") from the driver-core tree.
> > 
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
> > 
> > diff --cc sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > index 7eb9afc9b33d,ad21e636edc6..000000000000
> > --- a/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/intel/sst-haswell-pcm.c
> > @@@ -1173,9 -899,6 +1173,8 @@@ static const struct dev_pm_ops hsw_pcm_
> >   static struct platform_driver hsw_pcm_driver = {
> >   	.driver = {
> >   		.name = "haswell-pcm-audio",
> > - 		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> >  +		.pm = &hsw_pcm_pm,
> >  +
> >   	},
> >   
> >   	.probe = hsw_pcm_dev_probe,
> 
> 
> Fix looks good, thanks.

I assume that there was a good reason not to farm these patches out to
their respective maintainers?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped