linux-kernel - Re: Early test: hangs in mm/compact.c w. Linus's 12d7aacab56e9ef185c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:05:56 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:	"P. Christeas" <xrg@...ux.gr>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: Early test: hangs in mm/compact.c w. Linus's 12d7aacab56e9ef185c

On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 08:53:38AM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 07:07 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 11:18:37PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >>On 11/08/2014 02:11 PM, P. Christeas wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I think I finally found the cause by staring into the code... CCing
> >>people from all 4 separate threads I know about this issue.
> >>The problem with finding the cause was that the first report I got from
> >>Markus was about isolate_freepages_block() overhead, and later Norbert
> >>reported that reverting a patch for isolate_freepages* helped. But the
> >>problem seems to be that although the loop in isolate_migratepages exits
> >>because the scanners almost meet (they are within same pageblock), they
> >>don't truly meet, therefore compact_finished() decides to continue, but
> >>isolate_migratepages() exits immediately... boom! But indeed e14c720efdd7
> >>made this situation possible, as free scaner pfn can now point to a
> >>middle of pageblock.
> >
> >Indeed.
> >
> >>
> >>So I hope the attached patch will fix the soft-lockup issues in
> >>compact_zone. Please apply on 3.18-rc3 or later without any other reverts,
> >>and test. It probably won't help Markus and his isolate_freepages_block()
> >>overhead though...
> >
> >Yes, I found this bug too, but, it can't explain
> >isolate_freepages_block() overhead. Anyway, I can't find another bug
> >related to isolate_freepages_block(). :/
> 
> Thanks for checking.
> 
> >>Thanks,
> >>Vlastimil
> >>
> >>------8<------
> >>>From fbf8eb0bcd2897090312e23da6a31bad9cc6b337 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> >>Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 22:20:43 +0100
> >>Subject: [PATCH] mm, compaction: prevent endless loop in migrate scanner
> >>
> >>---
> >>  mm/compaction.c | 8 ++++++--
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> >>index ec74cf0..1b7a1be 100644
> >>--- a/mm/compaction.c
> >>+++ b/mm/compaction.c
> >>@@ -1029,8 +1029,12 @@ static isolate_migrate_t isolate_migratepages(struct zone *zone,
> >>  	}
> >>
> >>  	acct_isolated(zone, cc);
> >>-	/* Record where migration scanner will be restarted */
> >>-	cc->migrate_pfn = low_pfn;
> >>+	/*
> >>+	 * Record where migration scanner will be restarted. If we end up in
> >>+	 * the same pageblock as the free scanner, make the scanners fully
> >>+	 * meet so that compact_finished() terminates compaction.
> >>+	 */
> >>+	cc->migrate_pfn = (end_pfn <= cc->free_pfn) ? low_pfn : cc->free_pfn;
> >>
> >>  	return cc->nr_migratepages ? ISOLATE_SUCCESS : ISOLATE_NONE;
> >>  }
> >
> >IMHO, proper fix is not to change this logic, but, to change decision
> >logic in compact_finished() and in compact_zone(). Maybe helper
> >function would be good for readability.
> 
> OK but I would think that to fix 3.18 ASAP and not introduce more
> regressions, go with the patch above first, as it is the minimal fix
> and people already test it. Then we can implement your suggestion
> later as a cleanup for 3.19?

Yeap. Agreed.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/