[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2221359.WPjXKG5OT3@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:11:30 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Christian Daudt <bcm@...thebug.org>,
Matt Porter <mporter@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Broadcom Kernel Feedback List
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Antti Palosaari <crope@....fi>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
JD Zheng <jdzheng@...adcom.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/8] ARM: dts: Enable Broadcom Cygnus SoC
On Sunday 09 November 2014 21:17:37 Scott Branden wrote:
> On 14-11-09 12:38 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Sunday 09 November 2014 09:23:11 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 10:49:09PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >>>>>> +/*
> >>>>>> + * Copyright 2014 Broadcom Corporation. All rights reserved.
> >>>>>> + *
> >>>>>> + * Unless you and Broadcom execute a separate written software license
> >>>>>> + * agreement governing use of this software, this software is licensed
> >>>>>> to you
> >>>>>> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> >>>>>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation version 2.
> >>>>>> + *
> >>>>>> + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any
> >>>>>> + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty
> >>>>>> + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >>>>>> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We ask for new DT contents to be added with dual BSD/GPL license, to
> >>>>> allow for reuse of the DT data structures in other projects as well.
> >>>>> There's currently a lot of activity going on relicensing the current
> >>>>> files so I recommend sorting it out before they are added if you can.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> This may take more time than you think. I am going to have to go through
> >>>> legal to get such a license created. Also, why would you need dual license?
> >>>> If it is BSD that should serve both purposes?
> >>>
> >>> I haven't followed the discussion close enough to know if there's been
> >>> discussion about single-license BSD vs dual BSD/GPL.
> >
> > I think for all practical purposes, BSD and dual BSD/GPL is the same and
> > listing it as dual was meant as a clarification to make it easier to see
> > that all files in the kernel are GPLv2 compatible.
> A dual BSD/GPL may involve having me get a lawyer to create such a
> header. I would prefer to leave it as GPL for now until some concrete
> decision has finally been made on this by the rest of the community?
> Or, I can put it as BSD right now if that helps?
I would prefer a pure BSD header for the moment over a pure GPL header.
The last thing we want is to force other operating systems to create
another set of dts files for the same hardware.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists