lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:25:15 +0100
From:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
To:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AMR: sun7i: CPU hotplug support?

On 2014-11-10 07:03, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2014-11-10 00:17, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:35:49PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> did anyone already happen to look into enabling CPU hotplug for the
>>> Allwinner A20 in upstream? I'm currently running the sunxi-next branch
>>> on Banana Pi, and echo 0 > .../cpu1/online just hangs the system. The
>>> old 3.4 LeMaker kernel works fine in this regard. I can try to look into
>>> details and port things over, just want to avoid duplicate efforts.
>>
>> Having hotplug support would indeed be very welcome.
>>
>> However, it should be done in u-boot, through PSCI, and not in the
>> kernel itself.
>>
>> As far as I'm aware, no one worked actively on it, beside some WIP
>> commit from Marc a while ago:
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/maz/u-boot.git/commit/?h=wip/psci&id=45379c0f9cf812f0f62722f4015ec907fa5dc144
> 
> OK - I guess I will need a little guidance in then: Is there a good
> reference board to study and to derive from? And maybe also: What is
> missing or not working in that u-boot branch? If I get this interface
> right, I just takes some device tree bits to enable this for the kernel
> afterward, correct?

Started to play with that patch in naive ways: CPU0 locks up when
offlining CPU1 - unless I disable the FIQ signal from CPU1. Then it
"works", both offlining and onlining again. However, I suspect that this
only parks CPU1 in wfi and does not do anything interesting to it.

Jan



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ