[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5460A2A6.1020904@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 12:33:58 +0100
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/irq: BUG_ON() -> WARN_ON()
Hey,
Op 10-11-14 om 12:01 schreef Jani Nikula:
> On Sat, 08 Nov 2014, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> wrote:
>> Let's make things a bit easier to debug when things go bad (potentially
>> under console_lock).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> index 5ef03c2..c4edea9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
>> @@ -1029,7 +1029,8 @@ void drm_vblank_put(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
>> {
>> struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank = &dev->vblank[crtc];
>>
>> - BUG_ON(atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) == 0);
>> + if (WARN_ON(atomic_read(&vblank->refcount) == 0))
>> + return;
> While I approve of the change, I'd like to promote the use of WARN with
> a message instead of WARN_ON. See [1]. In fact it lead to us redefining
> WARN_ON in i915 [2].
I love the redefinition of WARN, but I think this should not be overridden locally, instead it should be a kernel debug option.
~Maarten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists