linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65218: Remove '.owner' field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKDJKT5yKp-JyGEsOjcQ=bxd6OddQqZgx0E8s2k=i-jHj9nRHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:49:16 +0530
From:	Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@...il.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: tps65218: Remove '.owner' field

Hi Mark,

On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:42:52PM +0530, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
>> Remove '.owner' field of driver structure as it is
>> going to be filled via "module_platform_driver" call.
>
> Same question as ever with this stuff: if we've decided to do this why
> are we doing it for a single driver and not as a genric cleanup?

There are many drivers needs to be changed with such fix.
Can we fix drivers with this fix module by module or all at once?
Please let me know your opinion.

Thanks
Manish Badarkhe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/