[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1415653538.21229.37.camel@x220>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:05:38 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL for v3.18-rc1] media updates
On Mon, 2014-11-10 at 18:54 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 10 Nov 2014 21:45:56 +0100
> Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl> escreveu:
> > This typo is still present in both next-20141110 and v3.18-rc4. And I've
> > first reported it nearly two months ago. I see two fixes:
> > 1) s/HAS_MMU/MMU/
> > 2) s/ || (COMPILE_TEST && HAS_MMU)//
> >
> > Which would you prefer?
>
> Hmm... Probably patchwork didn't get your patch.
There's no patch, not yet. I try to report stuff like this before
sending patches. The idea here being that the people familiar with the
code tend to fix things better and quicker.
> IMHO, the best would be:
>
> depends on HAS_MMU
You really like the HAS_MMU symbol, don't you?
> depends on ARCH_OMAP2 || ARCH_OMAP3 || COMPILE_TEST
But I understand what you're suggesting here. Should I draft a, probably
untested, patch?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists