[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 22:59:07 +0100
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/3] x86, ptdump: Add section for EFI runtime services
On 29 October 2014 15:22, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Oct, at 08:48:23PM, Mathias Krause wrote:
>> On 28 October 2014 19:57, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >
>> > Ok, thanks for refreshing this for me, your patch is good, so
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
>>
>> Thanks. But as you said, the EFI mappings shouldn't be in the kernel's
>> page table in the first place, so I'd rather see a patch doing that
>> instead. But, in the meantime, this patch is valid, as it shows the
>> "status quo".
>
> Now, everyone agrees this patch is OK? There are no comments that still
> need addressing?
Matt, do you mind to take this patch (and only this patch) through the EFI tree?
There were objections to patch 2 and 3 of this series from the x86
folks so I won't re-do those.
Regards,
Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists