lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:10:57 +0800
From:	Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
CC:	heiko@...ech.de, dianders@...omium.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Tony Xie <xxx@...k-chips.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/5] This is the 1st version of suspend for RK3288.

Hi Kevin

On 11/08/2014 06:48 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com> writes:
>
>> RK3288 can shut down the cpu, gpu and other device controllers in suspend,
>> and it will pull the GLOBAL_PWROFF pin to high in the final stage of the
>> process of suspend, pull the pin to low again when resume.
> The cover letter still doesn't state what this series applies to, or
> what its dependencies are for testing, even though it was requested in
> earlier reviews[1].  I discovered (again) by trial and error it applies
> to current linux-next.  I also discovered (as was earlier discussed[2])
> that it still does not resume using current upstream code, and those
> dependencies are not described here either.  These are the kinds of
> things that are crucial in a cover letter in order to help reviewers and
> testers not have to spend time digging through the archives trying to
> remember from the previous round of reviews.
Thank you for your review, I will perfect the cover letter in next 
version patches.

> Please, please list the out-of-tree dependencies, and how to test,
> including how you tested it, and on what hardware.
>
> Speaking of earlier reviews, I've noticed that after reviewing this
> series multiple times, you never respond to questions and/or comments.
> Two-way communication is important when collaborating on getting complex
> code this upstream, so please take some time to acknowledge the comments
> of reviewers and engage in discussion when questions are asked.  Even if
> it's as simple as "OK, I'll fix it in the next version", that helps
> reviewers know that they're not wasting their time.
OK, I'm going to respond all, even though only "Done".

> Kevin
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/29/759
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/29/881
>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ