[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 15:58:20 +0800
From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
<hc.yen@...iatek.com>, <yh.chen@...iatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<nathan.chung@...iatek.com>, Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
<yingjoe.chen@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5' 1/8] ARM: mediatek: Add basic support for mt8127
Hi, Matthias, Arnd,
After previous discussion[1], I'm not sure which one do you preferred
for mt8127/mt8135, so I send 64bits address version again. Trying to not
SPAM too much, I only send the difference(first 4 patches) this time.
We do have SoC that need >4GB address, so at least those will need to
use 64bits address. If we want to have a consistent look, 64bits is the
way to go. Also we already have some patches under review now using
64bits address. So I preferred this one, but both versions are OK to me.
Please help to review this and let me know anything you want me to
change. Thanks.
Joe.C
[1]
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/299598.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists