[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:15:41 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>, dedekind1@...il.com
CC: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] UBI: Extend UBI layer debug/messaging capabilities
Am 10.11.2014 um 18:37 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Am 03.11.2014 um 14:58 schrieb Tanya Brokhman:
>> If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
>> distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
>> Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
>>
>> The R/O block driver messages were replaced by pr_* since
>> ubi_device structure is not used by it.
>>
>> Amended a bit by Artem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
>
> I've rebased my fastmap work to linux-ubifs.git which contains this patch.
> While testing I noticed that the log output looks quite different.
>
> e.g.
> [ 26.564111] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:default fastmap pool size: 256
> [ 26.565438] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:default fastmap WL pool size: 128
> [ 26.566781] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:attaching mtd0 to ubi0
> [ 26.653704] UBI-0: scan_all:scanning is finished
> [ 26.654379] UBI-0: late_analysis:empty MTD device detected
> [ 26.761154] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:attached mtd0 (name "NAND simulator partition 0", size 128 MiB)
> [ 26.762112] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:PEB size: 16384 bytes (16 KiB), LEB size: 15872 bytes
> [ 26.762933] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:min./max. I/O unit sizes: 512/512, sub-page size 256
> [ 26.763765] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:VID header offset: 256 (aligned 256), data offset: 512
> [ 26.764607] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:good PEBs: 8192, bad PEBs: 0, corrupted PEBs: 0
> [ 26.765394] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:user volume: 0, internal volumes: 1, max. volumes count: 92
> [ 26.766244] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:max/mean erase counter: 0/0, WL threshold: 4096, image sequence number: 3297366243
> [ 26.767287] UBI-0: ubi_attach_mtd_dev:available PEBs: 8014, total reserved PEBs: 178, PEBs reserved for bad PEB handling: 160
> [ 26.769050] UBI-0: ubi_thread:background thread "ubi_bgt0d" started, PID 2686
> [ 29.119991] UBI-0: ubi_detach_mtd_dev:detaching mtd0
> [ 29.121084] UBI-0: ubi_thread:background thread "ubi_bgt0d" should stop, PID 2686
> [ 29.165538] UBI-0: ubi_detach_mtd_dev:mtd0 is detached
>
> Do we really want the function name in every log message?
> IMHO this is not wise except for pure debug logs.
BTW: Why UBI-X? This looks odd. Either use UBIX or ubiX.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists