lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:23:58 +0530
From:	Vivek Gautam <gautamvivek1987@...il.com>
To:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc:	Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux USB Mailing List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	andrew.kim@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 2/6] phy: improved lookup method

Hi Kishon,


On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 11 November 2014 02:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Friday 31 October 2014 06:03 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>> Hi Heikki,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Heikki Krogerus
>>>> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> Removes the need for the phys to be aware of their users
>>>>> even when not using DT. The method is copied from clkdev.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@...sung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  Documentation/phy.txt   |  66 ++++++++---------------
>>>>>  drivers/phy/phy-core.c  | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>  include/linux/phy/phy.h |  27 ++++++++++
>>>>>  3 files changed, 183 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/phy.txt b/Documentation/phy.txt
>>>>> index c6594af..8add515 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/phy.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/phy.txt
>>>>> @@ -54,18 +54,14 @@ The PHY driver should create the PHY in order for other peripheral controllers
>>>>>  to make use of it. The PHY framework provides 2 APIs to create the PHY.
>>>>>
>>>>>  struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
>>>>> -                      const struct phy_ops *ops,
>>>>> -                      struct phy_init_data *init_data);
>>>>> +                      const struct phy_ops *ops);
>>>>>  struct phy *devm_phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
>>>>> -                           const struct phy_ops *ops,
>>>>> -                           struct phy_init_data *init_data);
>>>>> +                           const struct phy_ops *ops);
>>>>>
>>>>>  The PHY drivers can use one of the above 2 APIs to create the PHY by passing
>>>>> -the device pointer, phy ops and init_data.
>>>>> +the device pointer and phy ops.
>>>>>  phy_ops is a set of function pointers for performing PHY operations such as
>>>>> -init, exit, power_on and power_off. *init_data* is mandatory to get a reference
>>>>> -to the PHY in the case of non-dt boot. See section *Board File Initialization*
>>>>> -on how init_data should be used.
>>>>> +init, exit, power_on and power_off.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Inorder to dereference the private data (in phy_ops), the phy provider driver
>>>>>  can use phy_set_drvdata() after creating the PHY and use phy_get_drvdata() in
>>>>> @@ -137,42 +133,24 @@ There are exported APIs like phy_pm_runtime_get, phy_pm_runtime_get_sync,
>>>>>  phy_pm_runtime_put, phy_pm_runtime_put_sync, phy_pm_runtime_allow and
>>>>>  phy_pm_runtime_forbid for performing PM operations.
>>>>>
>>>>> -8. Board File Initialization
>>>>> -
>>>>> -Certain board file initialization is necessary in order to get a reference
>>>>> -to the PHY in the case of non-dt boot.
>>>>> -Say we have a single device that implements 3 PHYs that of USB, SATA and PCIe,
>>>>> -then in the board file the following initialization should be done.
>>>>> -
>>>>> -struct phy_consumer consumers[] = {
>>>>> -       PHY_CONSUMER("dwc3.0", "usb"),
>>>>> -       PHY_CONSUMER("pcie.0", "pcie"),
>>>>> -       PHY_CONSUMER("sata.0", "sata"),
>>>>> -};
>>>>> -PHY_CONSUMER takes 2 parameters, first is the device name of the controller
>>>>> -(PHY consumer) and second is the port name.
>>>>> -
>>>>> -struct phy_init_data init_data = {
>>>>> -       .consumers = consumers,
>>>>> -       .num_consumers = ARRAY_SIZE(consumers),
>>>>> -};
>>>>> -
>>>>> -static const struct platform_device pipe3_phy_dev = {
>>>>> -       .name = "pipe3-phy",
>>>>> -       .id = -1,
>>>>> -       .dev = {
>>>>> -               .platform_data = {
>>>>> -                       .init_data = &init_data,
>>>>> -               },
>>>>> -       },
>>>>> -};
>>>>> -
>>>>> -then, while doing phy_create, the PHY driver should pass this init_data
>>>>> -       phy_create(dev, ops, pdata->init_data);
>>>>> -
>>>>> -and the controller driver (phy consumer) should pass the port name along with
>>>>> -the device to get a reference to the PHY
>>>>> -       phy_get(dev, "pcie");
>>>>> +8. PHY Mappings
>>>>> +
>>>>> +In order to get reference to a PHY without help from DeviceTree, the framework
>>>>> +offers lookups which can be compared to clkdev that allow clk structures to be
>>>>> +bound to devices. A lookup can be made statically by directly registering
>>>>> +phy_lookup structure which contains the name of the PHY device, the name of the
>>>>> +device which the PHY will be bind to and Connection ID string. Alternatively a
>>>>> +lookup can be made during runtime when a handle to the struct phy already
>>>>> +exists.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +The framework offers the following APIs for registering and unregistering the
>>>>> +lookups.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void phy_register_lookup(struct phy_lookup *pl);
>>>>> +int phy_create_lookup(struct phy *phy, const char *con_id, const char *dev_id);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +void phy_unregister_lookup(struct phy_lookup *pl);
>>>>> +void phy_remove_lookup(struct phy *phy, const char *con_id, const char *dev_id);
>>>>>
>>>>>  9. DeviceTree Binding
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>>>> index ff5eec5..c8d0f66 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>>>>>  static struct class *phy_class;
>>>>>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(phy_provider_mutex);
>>>>>  static LIST_HEAD(phy_provider_list);
>>>>> +static LIST_HEAD(phys);
>>>>>  static DEFINE_IDA(phy_ida);
>>>>>
>>>>>  static void devm_phy_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
>>>>> @@ -84,6 +85,138 @@ static struct phy *phy_lookup(struct device *device, const char *port)
>>>>>         return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>>>  }
>>>>>
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * phy_register_lookup() - register PHY/device association
>>>>> + * @pl: association to register
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +void phy_register_lookup(struct phy_lookup *pl)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
>>>>> +       list_add_tail(&pl->node, &phys);
>>>>> +       mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * phy_unregister_lookup() - remove PHY/device association
>>>>> + * @pl: association to be removed
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +void phy_unregister_lookup(struct phy_lookup *pl)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       mutex_lock(&phy_provider_mutex);
>>>>> +       list_del(&pl->node);
>>>>> +       mutex_unlock(&phy_provider_mutex);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * phy_create_lookup() - allocate and register PHY/device association
>>>>> + * @phy: the phy of the association
>>>>> + * @con_id: connection ID string on device
>>>>> + * @dev_id: the device of the association
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Creates and registers phy_lookup entry.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +int phy_create_lookup(struct phy *phy, const char *con_id, const char *dev_id)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       struct phy_lookup *pl;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       if (!phy || (!dev_id && !con_id))
>>>>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pl = kzalloc(sizeof(*pl), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>> +       if (!pl)
>>>>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       pl->phy_name = dev_name(phy->dev.parent);
>>>>> +       pl->dev_id = dev_id;
>>>>> +       pl->con_id = con_id;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       phy_register_lookup(pl);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       return 0;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_create_lookup);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * phy_remove_lookup() - find and remove PHY/device association
>>>>> + * @phy: the phy of the association
>>>>> + * @con_id: connection ID string on device
>>>>> + * @dev_id: the device of the association
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Finds and unregisters phy_lookup entry that was created with
>>>>> + * phy_create_lookup().
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +void phy_remove_lookup(struct phy *phy, const char *con_id, const char *dev_id)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       struct phy_lookup *pl;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       if (!phy || (!dev_id && !con_id))
>>>>> +               return;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       list_for_each_entry(pl, &phys, node)
>>>>> +               if (!strcmp(pl->phy_name, dev_name(phy->dev.parent)) &&
>>>>> +                   !strcmp(pl->dev_id, dev_id) &&
>>>>> +                   !strcmp(pl->con_id, con_id)) {
>>>>> +                       phy_unregister_lookup(pl);
>>>>> +                       kfree(pl);
>>>>> +                       return;
>>>>> +               }
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_remove_lookup);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static struct phy *phy_find(struct device *dev, const char *con_id)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       const char *dev_id = dev ? dev_name(dev) : NULL;
>>>>> +       int match, best_found = 0, best_possible = 0;
>>>>> +       struct phy *phy = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>>>> +       struct phy_lookup *p, *pl = NULL;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       if (dev_id)
>>>>> +               best_possible += 2;
>>>>> +       if (con_id)
>>>>> +               best_possible += 1;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       list_for_each_entry(p, &phys, node) {
>>>>> +               match = 0;
>>>>> +               if (p->dev_id) {
>>>>> +                       if (!dev_id || strcmp(p->dev_id, dev_id))
>>>>> +                               continue;
>>>>> +                       match += 2;
>>>>> +               }
>>>>> +               if (p->con_id) {
>>>>> +                       if (!con_id || strcmp(p->con_id, con_id))
>>>>> +                               continue;
>>>>> +                       match += 1;
>>>>> +               }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +               if (match > best_found) {
>>>>> +                       pl = p;
>>>>> +                       if (match != best_possible)
>>>>> +                               best_found = match;
>>>>> +                       else
>>>>> +                               break;
>>>>> +               }
>>>>> +       }
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       if (pl) {
>>>>> +               struct class_dev_iter iter;
>>>>> +               struct device *phy_dev;
>>>>> +
>>>>> +               class_dev_iter_init(&iter, phy_class, NULL, NULL);
>>>>> +               while ((phy_dev = class_dev_iter_next(&iter))) {
>>>>
>>>> We have the case with phy-exynos5-usbdrd driver, which registers two
>>>> phys usb2-phy and usb3-phy
>>>> both being used by xhci (after dwc3 creates a lookup table).
>>>>
>>>> The phy_dev is coming same for both the PHYs, and that's the reason
>>>> when i try to get
>>>> "usb2-phy" and "usb3-phy" i end up getting only usb2-phy.
>>>> This is happening with V4 of this patch; V3 seems fine. The only
>>>> differnece i see is
>>>> we are creating the phy_lookup_table using phy_dev->parent.
>>>>
>>>> Is there something that i am missing ?
>>>
>>> looks like a genuine problem.
>>>>
>>>>> +                       if (!strcmp(dev_name(phy_dev->parent), pl->phy_name)) {
>>>
>>> here there are two phys which has the same parent and the first one that
>>> matches will be returned. Hence you always get "usb2-phy".
>>>
>>> IIUC just with device names of parent, we won't be able to get the PHY. We need
>>> another 'variable' to differentiate it's children.
>>
>>> Or have *phy* pointer directly in the lookup table like how clk driver does?
>>
>> We do create the lookup table with actual *phy* pointer isn't it ?
>> Like if you see Heikki's last patch in this series:
>> [PATCHv4 6/6] usb: dwc3: host: convey the PHYs to xhci
>> We do pass the usb2_phy and usb3_phy pointers to phy_create_lookup().
>
> right, but phy_create_lookup doesn't store the *phy* pointer in the lookup table.

Right, so i think that's the place where we should rework to get the
correct phy.



-- 
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ