linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sched/deadline: support dl task migration during cpu hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:33:47 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] sched/deadline: support dl task migration during
 cpu hotplug

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:40:49AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> @@ -538,6 +539,46 @@ again:
>  	update_rq_clock(rq);
>  	dl_se->dl_throttled = 0;
>  	dl_se->dl_yielded = 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * So if we find that the rq the task was on is no longer
> +	 * available, we need to select a new rq.
> +	 */
> +	if (!rq->online) {
> +		struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
> +
> +		raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> +
> +		later_rq = find_lock_later_rq(p, rq);
> +
> +		if (!later_rq) {
> +			int cpu;
> +
> +			/*
> +			 * If cannot preempt any rq, fallback to pick any
> +			 * online cpu.
> +			 */
> +			for_each_cpu(cpu, &p->cpus_allowed)
> +				if (cpu_online(cpu))
> +					later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);

			cpu = cpumask_any_and(cpu_active_mask, tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
			if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
				/* fail */

			later_rq = cpu_rq(cpu);

> +			if (!later_rq) {
> +				pr_warn("fail to find any online and task
> +						will never come back to us\n");
> +				goto out;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
> +		set_task_cpu(p, later_rq->cpu);
> +		activate_task(later_rq, p, 0);
> +
> +		resched_curr(later_rq);
> +
> +		double_unlock_balance(rq, later_rq);
> +
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
>  		enqueue_task_dl(rq, p, ENQUEUE_REPLENISH);
>  		if (dl_task(rq->curr))
> @@ -555,7 +596,7 @@ again:
>  	}
>  unlock:
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> -
> +out:
>  	return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1185,8 +1226,12 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
>  	 * We have to consider system topology and task affinity
>  	 * first, then we can look for a suitable cpu.
>  	 */
> -	cpumask_copy(later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);
> -	cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> +	if (likely(task_rq(task)->online)) {
> +		cpumask_copy(later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);
> +		cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> +	} else
> +		/* for offline cpus we have a singleton rd */
> +		cpumask_copy(later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
>  	cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, &task->cpus_allowed);
>  	best_cpu = cpudl_find(&task_rq(task)->rd->cpudl,
>  			task, later_mask);

	cpumask_copy(later_mask, cpu_active_mask);
	if (likely(task_rq(task)->online))
		cpumask_and(later_mask, later_mask, task_rq(task)->rd->span);

Is the same, right and less lines.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/