lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:29:36 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...pv.it>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] pinctrl: pinconf-generic: Infer map type from DT property

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> wrote:
> On Monday 03 November 2014 11:05:26 Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>> With the new 'groups' property, the DT parser can infer the map type
>> from the fact whether 'pins' or 'groups' is used to specify the pin
>> group to work on.
>> To maintain backwards compatibitliy with current usage of the DT
>> binding, this is only done when an invalid map type is passed to the
>> parsing function.
>
> The Renesas PFC implements similar bindings with using the vendor-specific
> properties "renesas,pins" and "renesas,groups" (bindings and implementation
> available at Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/renesas,pfc-pinctrl.txt
> and drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pinctrl.c respectively).
>
> The Renesas implementation is a bit more generic in that it allows both pins
> and groups to be specified in a single subnode. Do you think that feature
> would make sense for pinconf-generic as well ?

I think for generic pin controllers either nodes with:

{
    function = "foo";
    pins = "A0", "A1", "A2";
}

or

{
    function = "foo";
    groups = "bar", "baz";
}

In parsing this it's easy to just look for "function" then see if
we're mapping to groups or pins.

It'd be nice if we could then centralize parsing of functions/pins/groups
and add the non-renesas-prefixed configs as alternatives to genericized
the bindings, while keeping backward compatibility.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ